Our Blogs

When individuals speak about transactional data, they usually imply financial transactions. According to Wikipedia, "Transactional Data is data that describes an event (the change that occurs as a consequence of a transaction) and is often represented using verbs." Transaction data includes a temporal dimension, a numerical value, and always relates to one or more objects." In this article, we will utilize data on server requests (internet traffic data) as an example, although the methodologies discussed may be applied to various datasets that come within the aforementioned definition of transactional data.

In a nutshell, anomaly detection is the detection of data points that should not typically exist in a data-generating system. Anomaly detection in transactional data has a wide range of uses; here are a few examples:

• Detection of fraud in financial transactions.
• Manufacturing fault detection.
• Detection of an attack or a failure 
• Predictive maintenance recommendation

Every year, consumers and organizations throughout the globe lose billions of dollars due to hackers' never-ending onslaught. Financial institutions will have to pay billions more to investigate and retrieve the stolen funds. As cyber-attacks grow more sophisticated, financial institutions must include effective fraud-prevention techniques into their plans to safeguard their clients and themselves from excessive costs.

Anomaly detection is a useful tool for spotting fraudulent activities and behaviors due to the ever-increasing quantity of data acquired by financial institutions.

What exactly is anomaly detection?

Anomaly detection in financial transactions divides data into two categories: normal distribution and outliers. When a transaction or a data point deviates from the regular behavior of a dataset, it is regarded as possibly fraudulent.

What is the process of detecting anomalies in payments and finance?

Because it delivers straightforward binary responses, the anomaly detection technique for transaction data is useful. An anomaly is defined as any unexpected shift from typical data patterns or an occurrence that does not correspond to model projections. If a transaction seems suspicious and perhaps fraudulent, the system may request that the consumer verify facts or go through further verification processes. Anomaly detection may be used to discover technical breakdowns, malfunctions, and possible possibilities such as a positive shift in customer behavior by examining many data sets.

When it comes to ordinary life, however, there are no universal patterns or business as usual. The same exceptionally high number of payments predicted on Black Friday would be noticeable on any other day, and vice versa. Even the most known peaks in the natural economic cycle, however, might fluctuate from time to time.

The coronavirus epidemic, for example, led to an increase in online payments and a decrease in in-store sales. Because the datasets used to train static anomaly detection algorithms lacked comparable historical trends, many transactions were identified as fraudulent when they were not. Many financial institutions throughout the globe have had their anomaly detection and anti-fraud systems fail for this same reason.

Anomalies must be detected in the financial services business because they may be suggestive of illicit activity such as fraud, identity theft, network infiltration, account takeover, or money laundering, which may have negative consequences for both the institution and the person.

Detecting outlier data, or abnormalities based on historical data patterns and trends, may improve a financial institution's operational team's knowledge and preparation.

The difficulty in recognizing anomalies

Anomaly detection is a difficult task for a number of reasons. First and foremost, the amount and complexity of data in the financial services business have increased in recent years. Furthermore, a strong focus has been put on data quality, transforming it into a means of measuring an institution's health.

To complicate things further, anomaly detection necessitates the prediction of something that has never been observed or anticipated. The rise of data, along with the fact that it is always changing, exacerbates the problem.

Anomaly detection enabled by machine learning

Using Machine Learning (ML) anti-fraud systems is a sophisticated strategy that decreases uncertainty by automating the complicated anomaly detection process. ML algorithms may be used to detect subtly, often concealed, events and correlations in user behavior that may indicate fraud. Anomaly detection using machine learning can handle massive datasets by comparing several factors in real-time to assess the probability of fraudulent transactions or activities.

Since the 1990s, machine learning has been used to detect fraudulent transactions. Since then, technology has advanced to the point where it can monitor and process transaction size, location, time, device, purchase data, and a variety of other characteristics all at once. Anomaly detection powered by machine learning can analyze considerably more financial data much quicker than human rule-based methods. Smart algorithms that analyze consumer behavior aid in reducing the number of verification stages that obstruct the consumer purchase path and reducing false positives, resulting in a significantly improved user experience.

Real-time anomaly detection in financial transactions allows businesses to react instantly to deviations from the usual, possibly saving millions of dollars that might otherwise be lost to fraud. Payments and finance organizations increase the effectiveness of their anti-fraud measures by decreasing the time lag between detecting and addressing an issue.

Manual anomaly detection with a person watching a dashboard with a few key performance indicators (KPIs) is not scalable to the millions of transactions users do every day, much alone the millions of metrics connected with them. Maintaining real-world responsiveness requires a sophisticated anomaly detection system driven by machine learning, capable of monitoring and correlating many complicated indicators with varying degrees of fluctuation while sifting through millions of data points each second.

Conclusion

Finding fraudulent behavior in transaction data may be very valuable to a wide range of businesses. The sheer vastness of the data sets in most circumstances necessitates an automated method. Furthermore, the data's complexity makes it impossible to develop hard-coded algorithms that predict all conceivable sorts of abnormalities. Leverage machine learning with Bayshore to detect anomaly trends that can cost your company a fortune.